The paper addresses the problem of adverse events (natural disasters) recognition in user-generated images from social media, addressing the problem from two complementary perspectives. On one side, we aim to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of different feature extraction and classification algorithms, relying on two different families of feature extraction algorithms, namely (i) Global features and (ii) Deep features. On the other hand, we demonstrate that the fusion of different feature extraction and classification strategies can outperform the single methods by jointly exploiting the capabilities of individual feature descriptors. The evaluation of the methods are carried out on two datasets, including a benchmark and a self-collected dataset.
A Comparative Study of Global and Deep Features for the Analysis of User-Generated Natural Disaster Related Images / Ahmad, Kashif; Sohail, Amir; Conci, Nicola; De Natale, Francesco. - (2018), pp. 1-5. (Intervento presentato al convegno 13th IEEE Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop, IVMSP 2018 tenutosi a Aristi Village, Zagori, Greece nel 10th-12th June 2018) [10.1109/IVMSPW.2018.8448670].
A Comparative Study of Global and Deep Features for the Analysis of User-Generated Natural Disaster Related Images
Ahmad, Kashif;Conci, Nicola;De Natale, Francesco
2018-01-01
Abstract
The paper addresses the problem of adverse events (natural disasters) recognition in user-generated images from social media, addressing the problem from two complementary perspectives. On one side, we aim to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of different feature extraction and classification algorithms, relying on two different families of feature extraction algorithms, namely (i) Global features and (ii) Deep features. On the other hand, we demonstrate that the fusion of different feature extraction and classification strategies can outperform the single methods by jointly exploiting the capabilities of individual feature descriptors. The evaluation of the methods are carried out on two datasets, including a benchmark and a self-collected dataset.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
08448670.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
94.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
94.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione