We introduce the problem of learning SMT(LRA)constraints from data. SMT(LRA) extends propositional logic with (in)equalities between numerical variables. Many relevant formal verification problems can be cast as SMT(LRA) instances and SMT (LRA) has supported recent developments in optimization and counting for hybrid Booleanand numerical domains. We introduce SMT(LRA) learning, the task of learning SMT (LRA) formulas from examples of feasible and infeasible instances, and we contribute INCAL, an exact non-greedy algorithm for this setting. Our approach encodes the learning task itself as an SMT(LRA) satisfiability problem that can be solved directly by SMT solvers.INCAL is an incremental algorithm that achieves exact learning by looking only at a small subset ofthe data, leading to significant speed-ups. We empirically evaluate our approach on both synthetic instances and benchmark problems taken from the SMT-LIB benchmarks repositor.
Learning SMT(LRA) Constraints using SMT Solvers / Kolb, Samuel Maria; Teso, Stefano; Passerini, Andrea; De Raedt, Luc. - (2018), pp. 2333-2340. (Intervento presentato al convegno IJCAI 2018 tenutosi a Stockholm nel 13th-19th July 2018) [10.24963/ijcai.2018/323].
Learning SMT(LRA) Constraints using SMT Solvers
Kolb, Samuel Maria;Teso, Stefano;Passerini, Andrea;
2018-01-01
Abstract
We introduce the problem of learning SMT(LRA)constraints from data. SMT(LRA) extends propositional logic with (in)equalities between numerical variables. Many relevant formal verification problems can be cast as SMT(LRA) instances and SMT (LRA) has supported recent developments in optimization and counting for hybrid Booleanand numerical domains. We introduce SMT(LRA) learning, the task of learning SMT (LRA) formulas from examples of feasible and infeasible instances, and we contribute INCAL, an exact non-greedy algorithm for this setting. Our approach encodes the learning task itself as an SMT(LRA) satisfiability problem that can be solved directly by SMT solvers.INCAL is an incremental algorithm that achieves exact learning by looking only at a small subset ofthe data, leading to significant speed-ups. We empirically evaluate our approach on both synthetic instances and benchmark problems taken from the SMT-LIB benchmarks repositor.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ijcai18.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
254.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
254.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione