Since the Dalai Lama fled into exile, in 1959, China has gained formal international recognition of its sovereign claim to Tibet through a combination of physical occupation and realpolitik. In parallel, however, over the last decades, a strategy of non-violence and global outreach has created considerable inter-national interest in the human rights situation in Tibet and in the autonomy claims of Tibetans (in exile), reaching a peak after demonstrations, riots and subsequent Chinese crackdown in early 2008, just before the Beijing Olympic Games.
Neither Panacea nor Pandora’s Box: comparing autonomy with a view on Tibet and China / Woelk, Jens. - STAMPA. - (2017), pp. 1-20.
Neither Panacea nor Pandora’s Box: comparing autonomy with a view on Tibet and China
Woelk, Jens
2017-01-01
Abstract
Since the Dalai Lama fled into exile, in 1959, China has gained formal international recognition of its sovereign claim to Tibet through a combination of physical occupation and realpolitik. In parallel, however, over the last decades, a strategy of non-violence and global outreach has created considerable inter-national interest in the human rights situation in Tibet and in the autonomy claims of Tibetans (in exile), reaching a peak after demonstrations, riots and subsequent Chinese crackdown in early 2008, just before the Beijing Olympic Games.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2017 Tibet Routledge Neither panacea Woelk 1-20.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.79 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.79 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



