This work presents experimental results on a coordination game in which agents must repeatedly choose between two sides, and a positive fixed payoff is assigned only to agents who pick the minoritarian side. We conduct laboratory experiments in which stationary groups of five players play the game for 100 periods, and manipulate two treatment variables: the amount of ‘memory’ M that players have regarding the game history (i.e., the length of the string of past outcomes that players can see on the screen while choosing), and the amount of information about other players’ past choices. Our results show that, at the aggregate level a quite remarkable degree of coordination is achieved. Moreover providing players with full information about other players’ choice distribution does not appear to improve efficiency significantly. At the individual level, a substantial portion of subjects exhibit ‘inertial’ behavior.
Coordination and Self-Organization in Minority Games: Experimental Evidence / G., Bottazzi; Devetag, Maria Giovanna. - STAMPA. - 531:(2004), pp. 283-300. (Intervento presentato al convegno WEHIA02 (Workshop on Economies with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents) tenutosi a Abdus Salam International Centre for Physics; Trieste, Italy, nel 29-31 May 2002) [10.1007/978-3-642-17045-4_17].
Coordination and Self-Organization in Minority Games: Experimental Evidence
Devetag, Maria Giovanna
2004-01-01
Abstract
This work presents experimental results on a coordination game in which agents must repeatedly choose between two sides, and a positive fixed payoff is assigned only to agents who pick the minoritarian side. We conduct laboratory experiments in which stationary groups of five players play the game for 100 periods, and manipulate two treatment variables: the amount of ‘memory’ M that players have regarding the game history (i.e., the length of the string of past outcomes that players can see on the screen while choosing), and the amount of information about other players’ past choices. Our results show that, at the aggregate level a quite remarkable degree of coordination is achieved. Moreover providing players with full information about other players’ choice distribution does not appear to improve efficiency significantly. At the individual level, a substantial portion of subjects exhibit ‘inertial’ behavior.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
papero02_15.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
237.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
237.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione