In many Information Retrieval tasks, the boundary between classes is not well defined, and assigning a document to a specific class may be complicated, even for humans. For instance, a document which is not directly related to the user's query may still contain relevant information. In this scenario, an option is to define an intermediate class collecting ambiguous instances. Yet some natural questions arise. Is this annotation strategy convenient? how should the intermediate class be treated? To answer these questions, we explored two community question answering datasets whose comments were originally annotated with three classes. We re-annotated a subset of instances considering a binary good vs bad setting. Our main contribution is to show empirically that the inclusion of an intermediate class to assess Boolean relevance is not useful. Moreover, in case the data is already annotated with a 3-class strategy, the instances from the intermediate class can be safely removed at training time.
On the Use of an Intermediate Class in Boolean Crowdsourced Relevance Annotations for Learning to Rank Comments / Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto; Da San Martino, Giovanni; Filice, Simone; Moschitti, Alessandro. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017), pp. 1209-1212. (Intervento presentato al convegno SIGIR '17 tenutosi a Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan nel 7 - 11 August, 2017) [10.1145/3077136.3080763].
On the Use of an Intermediate Class in Boolean Crowdsourced Relevance Annotations for Learning to Rank Comments
Alessandro Moschitti
2017-01-01
Abstract
In many Information Retrieval tasks, the boundary between classes is not well defined, and assigning a document to a specific class may be complicated, even for humans. For instance, a document which is not directly related to the user's query may still contain relevant information. In this scenario, an option is to define an intermediate class collecting ambiguous instances. Yet some natural questions arise. Is this annotation strategy convenient? how should the intermediate class be treated? To answer these questions, we explored two community question answering datasets whose comments were originally annotated with three classes. We re-annotated a subset of instances considering a binary good vs bad setting. Our main contribution is to show empirically that the inclusion of an intermediate class to assess Boolean relevance is not useful. Moreover, in case the data is already annotated with a 3-class strategy, the instances from the intermediate class can be safely removed at training time.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2017_SIGIR_Annotations.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
511.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
511.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
3077136.3080763.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
907.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
907.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione