Recent research results in the field of algorithms for Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) have pointed out that the estimators based on dynamic phasor models are generally preferable to track waveform parameters over time. This statement is definitely true when amplitude, phase, frequency and rate of change of frequency (ROCOF) fluctuate significantly within the observation interval used to estimate them. Unfortunately, these estimation algorithms can be very sensitive to narrow-band disturbances, unless these contributions are explicitly included in the model at the expense of a larger computational complexity. However, if the observation intervals are so short that the waveform parameter variations each of them are minor, then algorithms based on static phasor model can provide accurate results with a reasonably low computational burden. Since the waveform fundamental frequency is a key parameter for power systems monitoring and control, in this paper the estimation accuracy of three classes of state-of-the-art algorithms based on a static signal model is analyzed and compared when only few waveform cycles affected by both steady-state disturbances (e.g. harmonics) and amplitude or phase oscillations are collected.

Power system frequency estimation accuracy of improved DFT-based algorithms over short intervals / Belega, Daniel; Macii, David; Petri, Dario. - ELETTRONICO. - (2016), pp. 1-6. (Intervento presentato al convegno 7th IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems, AMPS 2016 tenutosi a Aachen, Germany nel 28-30 September 2016) [10.1109/AMPS.2016.7602810].

Power system frequency estimation accuracy of improved DFT-based algorithms over short intervals

Macii, David;Petri, Dario
2016-01-01

Abstract

Recent research results in the field of algorithms for Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) have pointed out that the estimators based on dynamic phasor models are generally preferable to track waveform parameters over time. This statement is definitely true when amplitude, phase, frequency and rate of change of frequency (ROCOF) fluctuate significantly within the observation interval used to estimate them. Unfortunately, these estimation algorithms can be very sensitive to narrow-band disturbances, unless these contributions are explicitly included in the model at the expense of a larger computational complexity. However, if the observation intervals are so short that the waveform parameter variations each of them are minor, then algorithms based on static phasor model can provide accurate results with a reasonably low computational burden. Since the waveform fundamental frequency is a key parameter for power systems monitoring and control, in this paper the estimation accuracy of three classes of state-of-the-art algorithms based on a static signal model is analyzed and compared when only few waveform cycles affected by both steady-state disturbances (e.g. harmonics) and amplitude or phase oscillations are collected.
2016
2016 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems, AMPS 2016 - Proceedings
Piscataway, NJ
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
9781509023738
Belega, Daniel; Macii, David; Petri, Dario
Power system frequency estimation accuracy of improved DFT-based algorithms over short intervals / Belega, Daniel; Macii, David; Petri, Dario. - ELETTRONICO. - (2016), pp. 1-6. (Intervento presentato al convegno 7th IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems, AMPS 2016 tenutosi a Aachen, Germany nel 28-30 September 2016) [10.1109/AMPS.2016.7602810].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Belega_Macii_2016.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 261.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
261.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/180742
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact