This contribution aims to explore the ways in which the right to participation of indigenous peoples has been framed in the decisions of human rights treaty bodies. In line with the purposes of volume in which it is included, this contribution concentrates on public participation, and it only refers to information and access to justice when relevant for clarifying aspects of participatory rights. This chapter argues that the right to participation has both procedural and substantive implications for indigenous peoples. Indeed, the right to be consulted is not the only manifestation of the right of indigenous peoples to participate in decision-making processes. The qualification of effectiveness that human rights treaty bodies have elaborated on, as well as the consent requirement evoked in some specific circumstances, may give indigenous peoples substantive powers in terms of land and resource management, as well as constituting an instrument for reviewing the merits of the policies promoted by the State or private actors. This chapter also contends that collective rights can give the public interest component of participation a new meaning. The general interest of larger national societies is in fact to be balanced against the consideration of the collective interests of national groups.

The Public Interest to Environmental Protection and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Procedural Rights to Participation and Substantive Guarantees / Cittadino, Federica. - STAMPA. - 205:(2015), pp. 75-90.

The Public Interest to Environmental Protection and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Procedural Rights to Participation and Substantive Guarantees

Cittadino, Federica
2015-01-01

Abstract

This contribution aims to explore the ways in which the right to participation of indigenous peoples has been framed in the decisions of human rights treaty bodies. In line with the purposes of volume in which it is included, this contribution concentrates on public participation, and it only refers to information and access to justice when relevant for clarifying aspects of participatory rights. This chapter argues that the right to participation has both procedural and substantive implications for indigenous peoples. Indeed, the right to be consulted is not the only manifestation of the right of indigenous peoples to participate in decision-making processes. The qualification of effectiveness that human rights treaty bodies have elaborated on, as well as the consent requirement evoked in some specific circumstances, may give indigenous peoples substantive powers in terms of land and resource management, as well as constituting an instrument for reviewing the merits of the policies promoted by the State or private actors. This chapter also contends that collective rights can give the public interest component of participation a new meaning. The general interest of larger national societies is in fact to be balanced against the consideration of the collective interests of national groups.
2015
Participatory Rights in the Environmental Decision-Making Process and the Implementation of the Aarhus Convention: A Comparative Perspective
Berlino
Duncker & Humblot
978-3-428-14613-0
Cittadino, Federica
The Public Interest to Environmental Protection and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Procedural Rights to Participation and Substantive Guarantees / Cittadino, Federica. - STAMPA. - 205:(2015), pp. 75-90.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015_Cittadino_IPs and participation.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: capitolo
Tipologia: Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 391.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
391.68 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/170130
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact