Starting from our common life experiences - behaviours, that are normally backed up by mental processes which, in turn, are based upon more or less justified beliefs - I will show how our epistemological access to the world can lead us to wrong inferences which could leave us prisoners in a room (sections 1 and 2).A brief, somehow historical, survey of conceptual theories lays the basis to better understand how a recent cognitive theory (Theory-Theory) has lead to parallels between the reasoning we make in our everyday life and those that have to do with science. With regards to this, I will give an example taken from a diagnosis in dermatology (section 3). This example is also shown in a 'version' implemented at the computer, leaving a question behind (and open): quite often, when interviewed, why do not doctors make their reasoning clear, when that type of 'reasoning' can be considered so clear to allow the setting up of a real algorithm implemented on neural networks? (section 4). The conclusion, far from giving one (or more) answer(s), just wants to warn against possible reductionist or/and functionalist temptations (section 5).

Behavior, mental processes and theories: prisoners in the room of our beliefs (and our computations) / Celi, Luciano. - STAMPA. - (2005), pp. 59-68. (Intervento presentato al convegno E-CAP’04 tenutosi a Pavia nel 3-5 June 2004).

Behavior, mental processes and theories: prisoners in the room of our beliefs (and our computations)

Celi, Luciano
2005-01-01

Abstract

Starting from our common life experiences - behaviours, that are normally backed up by mental processes which, in turn, are based upon more or less justified beliefs - I will show how our epistemological access to the world can lead us to wrong inferences which could leave us prisoners in a room (sections 1 and 2).A brief, somehow historical, survey of conceptual theories lays the basis to better understand how a recent cognitive theory (Theory-Theory) has lead to parallels between the reasoning we make in our everyday life and those that have to do with science. With regards to this, I will give an example taken from a diagnosis in dermatology (section 3). This example is also shown in a 'version' implemented at the computer, leaving a question behind (and open): quite often, when interviewed, why do not doctors make their reasoning clear, when that type of 'reasoning' can be considered so clear to allow the setting up of a real algorithm implemented on neural networks? (section 4). The conclusion, far from giving one (or more) answer(s), just wants to warn against possible reductionist or/and functionalist temptations (section 5).
2005
Computing and philosophy: proceedings of the European Computing and Philosophy Conference, ECAP 2004, Italy
Pavia
Associated International Academic Publishers
8889659025
Celi, Luciano
Behavior, mental processes and theories: prisoners in the room of our beliefs (and our computations) / Celi, Luciano. - STAMPA. - (2005), pp. 59-68. (Intervento presentato al convegno E-CAP’04 tenutosi a Pavia nel 3-5 June 2004).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
0601_beavior_mental_ecap2004.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Atti del convegno
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.71 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/157136
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact