During the monitoring of extremely slow landslide movements great attention should be paid to the precision and accuracy of measurements, because they are usually affected by random and systematic errors with the same order of magni-tude of the displacements. This paper describes the errors recognized for incli-nometer and Total Station measurements carried out in two cases of viaduct-large extremely slow landslide interactions. Systematic errors in the inclinometer displacements were recognized by collecting four-groove measurements, and were reduced by integrating the displacements locally, where the sliding surfaces were identified. Systematic errors in the Total Station displacements were attributed to the changes of the refraction index depending on the atmospheric conditions, and were reduced by calculating only the average rate of displacements. For both the inclinometer and Total Station measurements systematic errors were found to be of the same order of magnitude of the displacements, while precision was at least one order less. After correcting the systematic errors, the redundancy between the two types of measurements resulted very good and then it was possible to estimate a rate of movement less than 10 mm/year by using only 2 or 3 years of measurements.

Reliability of displacement measurements in two cases of viaduct-extremely slow landslide interactions / Simeoni, Lucia; Ferro, E; Tombolato, S.. - 2:(2015), pp. 125-128. (Intervento presentato al convegno XII IAEG CONGRESS tenutosi a Torino nel 15-19 Settembre 2014) [10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_11].

Reliability of displacement measurements in two cases of viaduct-extremely slow landslide interactions

Simeoni, Lucia;Ferro E;
2015-01-01

Abstract

During the monitoring of extremely slow landslide movements great attention should be paid to the precision and accuracy of measurements, because they are usually affected by random and systematic errors with the same order of magni-tude of the displacements. This paper describes the errors recognized for incli-nometer and Total Station measurements carried out in two cases of viaduct-large extremely slow landslide interactions. Systematic errors in the inclinometer displacements were recognized by collecting four-groove measurements, and were reduced by integrating the displacements locally, where the sliding surfaces were identified. Systematic errors in the Total Station displacements were attributed to the changes of the refraction index depending on the atmospheric conditions, and were reduced by calculating only the average rate of displacements. For both the inclinometer and Total Station measurements systematic errors were found to be of the same order of magnitude of the displacements, while precision was at least one order less. After correcting the systematic errors, the redundancy between the two types of measurements resulted very good and then it was possible to estimate a rate of movement less than 10 mm/year by using only 2 or 3 years of measurements.
2015
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory
Cham (Cantone Zug)
Springer International Publishing Switzerland
9783319090566
Simeoni, Lucia; Ferro, E; Tombolato, S.
Reliability of displacement measurements in two cases of viaduct-extremely slow landslide interactions / Simeoni, Lucia; Ferro, E; Tombolato, S.. - 2:(2015), pp. 125-128. (Intervento presentato al convegno XII IAEG CONGRESS tenutosi a Torino nel 15-19 Settembre 2014) [10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_11].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SP14 S03 Simeoni_2014.IAEG.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 240.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
240.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/143234
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact