Existing systems for wildlife monitoring focus either on acquiring the location of animals via GPS or detecting their proximity via wireless communication; the integration of the two, remarkably increasing the biological value of the data gathered, is hitherto unexplored. We offer this integration as our first contribution, embodied by our WildScope system whose key functionality is geo-referenced proximity detection of an animal to others or to landmarks. However, to be truly useful to biologists, the in-field monitoring system must be complemented by two key elements, largely neglected by the literature and constituting our other contributions: i) a model exposing the tradeoffs between accuracy and lifetime, enabling biologists to determine the configuration best suited to their needs, a task complicated by the rich set of on-board devices (GPS, low-power radio, GSM modem) whose activation depends strongly on the biological questions and target species at hand; ii) a validation in controlled experiments that, by eliciting the relationship between proximity detection, the distance at which it reliably occurs, and the location acquisition, provides the cornerstone for the biologists' analysis of wildlife behavior. We test WildScope in real-world experimental setups and deployments with different degrees of control, ascertaining the platform accuracy w.r.t. ground truth and comparing against a commercial proximity logger.
Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization / Picco, Gian Pietro; Molteni, Davide; Murphy, Amy L.; Ossi, Federico; Cagnacci, Francesca; Corrà, Michele; Nicoloso, Sandro. - STAMPA. - (2015), pp. 238-249. (Intervento presentato al convegno IPSN tenutosi a Seattle, USA nel 13-16 aprile 2015) [10.1145/2737095.2737103].
Geo-referenced proximity detection of wildlife with WildScope: design and characterization
Picco, Gian Pietro;Molteni, Davide;
2015-01-01
Abstract
Existing systems for wildlife monitoring focus either on acquiring the location of animals via GPS or detecting their proximity via wireless communication; the integration of the two, remarkably increasing the biological value of the data gathered, is hitherto unexplored. We offer this integration as our first contribution, embodied by our WildScope system whose key functionality is geo-referenced proximity detection of an animal to others or to landmarks. However, to be truly useful to biologists, the in-field monitoring system must be complemented by two key elements, largely neglected by the literature and constituting our other contributions: i) a model exposing the tradeoffs between accuracy and lifetime, enabling biologists to determine the configuration best suited to their needs, a task complicated by the rich set of on-board devices (GPS, low-power radio, GSM modem) whose activation depends strongly on the biological questions and target species at hand; ii) a validation in controlled experiments that, by eliciting the relationship between proximity detection, the distance at which it reliably occurs, and the location acquisition, provides the cornerstone for the biologists' analysis of wildlife behavior. We test WildScope in real-world experimental setups and deployments with different degrees of control, ascertaining the platform accuracy w.r.t. ground truth and comparing against a commercial proximity logger.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ipsn15.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza:
Altra licenza (Other type of license)
Dimensione
9.08 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.08 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
2737095.2737103.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.92 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.92 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione