A not clear national framework and the uncertainty as to the transferability of the U.S. HCM require an assessment of standard methodologies more calibrated on Italian freeways. The study is aimed at testing the Levels of Service assessment for a sample freeway segment on the basis of a calibrated Fundamental Diagram, and at evaluating its consistency with respect to the most recent methodologies from HCM2010. The research shows a test calibration of the Fundamental Diagram according to the Longitudinal Control Model and Van Aerde Model. The comparative analysis shows how standard procedures and ranges could underestimate operational congestion levels on the test section. Therefore, the results suggest that operators should to use carefully HCM standard procedures and that transferability issues should be further analyzed.

Differences between HCM procedures and fundamental diagram calibration for operational los assessment on Italian freeways / Pompigna, A.; Rupi, F.. - In: TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROCEDIA. - ISSN 2352-1465. - ELETTRONICO. - 5:(2015), pp. 103-118. (Intervento presentato al convegno SIDT Scientific Seminar 2013 tenutosi a Trieste nel 17-18 October 2013) [10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.016].

Differences between HCM procedures and fundamental diagram calibration for operational los assessment on Italian freeways

Pompigna A.;
2015-01-01

Abstract

A not clear national framework and the uncertainty as to the transferability of the U.S. HCM require an assessment of standard methodologies more calibrated on Italian freeways. The study is aimed at testing the Levels of Service assessment for a sample freeway segment on the basis of a calibrated Fundamental Diagram, and at evaluating its consistency with respect to the most recent methodologies from HCM2010. The research shows a test calibration of the Fundamental Diagram according to the Longitudinal Control Model and Van Aerde Model. The comparative analysis shows how standard procedures and ranges could underestimate operational congestion levels on the test section. Therefore, the results suggest that operators should to use carefully HCM standard procedures and that transferability issues should be further analyzed.
2015
Transportation Research Procedia
SARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
Elsevier
Pompigna, A.; Rupi, F.
Differences between HCM procedures and fundamental diagram calibration for operational los assessment on Italian freeways / Pompigna, A.; Rupi, F.. - In: TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROCEDIA. - ISSN 2352-1465. - ELETTRONICO. - 5:(2015), pp. 103-118. (Intervento presentato al convegno SIDT Scientific Seminar 2013 tenutosi a Trieste nel 17-18 October 2013) [10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.016].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/305934
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact