Pseudopartitive constructions are constructions of the form DP-of-NP, where the quantificational, collective or container DP head is interpreted as measuring the embedded NP. A verb can agree either with the head (Head Agreement) or with the embedded NP (Embedded Agreement). We argue that agreement alternations with pseudopartitives form part of linguistic competence. Specifically, we account for them in terms of a dual labelling option open to of-DP/NP constituents, as either PPs (of projecting) or as NPs (of not projecting). Thus, we reject the conclusion that pseudopartitives are to be accounted for in processing terms, and wholly subsumed under agreement attraction. In two studies, we investigate subject-verb number agreement (Study 1, N = 103) and gender agreement (Study 2, N = 87), in an acceptability task with pseudopartitive constructions involving either a collective noun or an approximate quantifier, controlling for the nature of the head. Results show that Italian pseudopartitives allows embedded agreement, depending on the speaker and on the nature of the head (quantifiers better than collective Ns).

Pseudopartitives vs. agreement attraction: an experimental study / Mazzaggio, G; Franco, L; Manzini, Mr. - In: LINGUE E LINGUAGGIO. - ISSN 1720-9331. - 19:2(2020), pp. 159-190. [10.1418/99002]

Pseudopartitives vs. agreement attraction: an experimental study

Mazzaggio, G;Manzini, MR
2020-01-01

Abstract

Pseudopartitive constructions are constructions of the form DP-of-NP, where the quantificational, collective or container DP head is interpreted as measuring the embedded NP. A verb can agree either with the head (Head Agreement) or with the embedded NP (Embedded Agreement). We argue that agreement alternations with pseudopartitives form part of linguistic competence. Specifically, we account for them in terms of a dual labelling option open to of-DP/NP constituents, as either PPs (of projecting) or as NPs (of not projecting). Thus, we reject the conclusion that pseudopartitives are to be accounted for in processing terms, and wholly subsumed under agreement attraction. In two studies, we investigate subject-verb number agreement (Study 1, N = 103) and gender agreement (Study 2, N = 87), in an acceptability task with pseudopartitive constructions involving either a collective noun or an approximate quantifier, controlling for the nature of the head. Results show that Italian pseudopartitives allows embedded agreement, depending on the speaker and on the nature of the head (quantifiers better than collective Ns).
2020
2
Mazzaggio, G; Franco, L; Manzini, Mr
Pseudopartitives vs. agreement attraction: an experimental study / Mazzaggio, G; Franco, L; Manzini, Mr. - In: LINGUE E LINGUAGGIO. - ISSN 1720-9331. - 19:2(2020), pp. 159-190. [10.1418/99002]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vol_2020_2_XIX_Mazzaggio_et_al.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 283.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
283.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/294960
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact