Commentary on Decisions regarding the admission of documentary evidence (Decision on the Prosecution’s Request for Admission of Documentary Evidence, Situation in the Republic of Kenya in the case of Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang, Case No. ICC-01/09-01/11, TC V(A), 10 June 2014 and Separate Further Opinion of Judge Eboe-Osuji) / Di Paolo, Gabriella. - STAMPA. - XLIII:(2021), pp. 230-239.

Commentary on Decisions regarding the admission of documentary evidence (Decision on the Prosecution’s Request for Admission of Documentary Evidence, Situation in the Republic of Kenya in the case of Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang, Case No. ICC-01/09-01/11, TC V(A), 10 June 2014 and Separate Further Opinion of Judge Eboe-Osuji)

Di Paolo, Gabriella
2021-01-01

2021
Cambridge
Intersentia
978-1-83970-110-8
Commentary on Decisions regarding the admission of documentary evidence (Decision on the Prosecution’s Request for Admission of Documentary Evidence, Situation in the Republic of Kenya in the case of Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang, Case No. ICC-01/09-01/11, TC V(A), 10 June 2014 and Separate Further Opinion of Judge Eboe-Osuji) / Di Paolo, Gabriella. - STAMPA. - XLIII:(2021), pp. 230-239.
Di Paolo, Gabriella
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/271149
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact