Over the last decade, European Union trade agreement negotiations in the form of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CETA) with Canada have been strongly contested. By contrast, many other EU trade negotiations have sailed on with far less politicization, or barely any at all. In this contribution, we assess a series of plausible explanation for these very varying degrees of politicization across EU trade agreement negotiations – conceived of as the combination of polarization of opinions, salience given to them in public debate, and the expansion of the number of societal actors involved therein. Through a review of existing explanations, we show how each of these explanations faces a set of challenges. In the third section, we argue it is useful to conceive of these existing explanations as structural background conditions enabling agency on the part of interest group and civil society organizations. We therefore close by sketching how literature on the relationship between interest group mobilization and public opinion could inform further comparative research on trade policy negotiations and on politicization of EU policy making in general.

Towards explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations / De Bièvre, Dirk; Poletti, Arlo. - In: POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE. - ISSN 2183-2463. - 2020:8(2020). [10.17645/pag.v8i1.2686]

Towards explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations

Arlo Poletti
2020-01-01

Abstract

Over the last decade, European Union trade agreement negotiations in the form of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CETA) with Canada have been strongly contested. By contrast, many other EU trade negotiations have sailed on with far less politicization, or barely any at all. In this contribution, we assess a series of plausible explanation for these very varying degrees of politicization across EU trade agreement negotiations – conceived of as the combination of polarization of opinions, salience given to them in public debate, and the expansion of the number of societal actors involved therein. Through a review of existing explanations, we show how each of these explanations faces a set of challenges. In the third section, we argue it is useful to conceive of these existing explanations as structural background conditions enabling agency on the part of interest group and civil society organizations. We therefore close by sketching how literature on the relationship between interest group mobilization and public opinion could inform further comparative research on trade policy negotiations and on politicization of EU policy making in general.
2020
8
De Bièvre, Dirk; Poletti, Arlo
Towards explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations / De Bièvre, Dirk; Poletti, Arlo. - In: POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE. - ISSN 2183-2463. - 2020:8(2020). [10.17645/pag.v8i1.2686]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
P&G_De Bièvre and Poletti_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 275.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
275.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/253354
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact