The contact angle is one of the most sensitive experimental values describing a junction between three phases, being influenced by the composition and properties of contacting media as well as the structure and composition of interfaces involved. The origins and importance of the contact angle in analysis of three phase systems date back to the famous works on cohesion and adhesion of fluids published by Thomas Young in 1805 and later by Athanase Dupré in 1869. Since then, the contact angle has remained one of the most important values measured experimentally during characterization of solids and their wetting characteristics. Such measurements, however, involve solid surfaces that deviate from the idealized ones used in thermodynamic and mechanical modelling of three-phase junctions by Young, Dupré, and others, and there is typically more than one value of contact angle measured on such surfaces. As a result, the attention of scientists and researchers in the last two centuries has been on development of methods for accurate contact angle measurements, interpretation of experimental values and understanding the causes of contact angle value variation and contact angle hysteresis. This paper reviews advancements made in interpretation of experimental contact angles and their use in characterization of solid surfaces.

Contact angles: history of over 200 years of open questions / Drelich, Jaroslaw; Boinovich, Ludmila; Chibowski, Emil; Della Volpe, Claudio; Holysz, Lucyna; Marmur, Abraham; Siboni, Stefano. - In: SURFACE INNOVATIONS. - ISSN 2050-6252. - STAMPA. - 2020 Volume 8:Issue 1-2(2020), pp. 3-27. [10.1680/jsuin.19.00007]

Contact angles: history of over 200 years of open questions

Della Volpe, Claudio;Siboni, Stefano
2020-01-01

Abstract

The contact angle is one of the most sensitive experimental values describing a junction between three phases, being influenced by the composition and properties of contacting media as well as the structure and composition of interfaces involved. The origins and importance of the contact angle in analysis of three phase systems date back to the famous works on cohesion and adhesion of fluids published by Thomas Young in 1805 and later by Athanase Dupré in 1869. Since then, the contact angle has remained one of the most important values measured experimentally during characterization of solids and their wetting characteristics. Such measurements, however, involve solid surfaces that deviate from the idealized ones used in thermodynamic and mechanical modelling of three-phase junctions by Young, Dupré, and others, and there is typically more than one value of contact angle measured on such surfaces. As a result, the attention of scientists and researchers in the last two centuries has been on development of methods for accurate contact angle measurements, interpretation of experimental values and understanding the causes of contact angle value variation and contact angle hysteresis. This paper reviews advancements made in interpretation of experimental contact angles and their use in characterization of solid surfaces.
2020
Issue 1-2
Drelich, Jaroslaw; Boinovich, Ludmila; Chibowski, Emil; Della Volpe, Claudio; Holysz, Lucyna; Marmur, Abraham; Siboni, Stefano
Contact angles: history of over 200 years of open questions / Drelich, Jaroslaw; Boinovich, Ludmila; Chibowski, Emil; Della Volpe, Claudio; Holysz, Lucyna; Marmur, Abraham; Siboni, Stefano. - In: SURFACE INNOVATIONS. - ISSN 2050-6252. - STAMPA. - 2020 Volume 8:Issue 1-2(2020), pp. 3-27. [10.1680/jsuin.19.00007]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jsuin.19.00007.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo completo, nella versione editoriale, cartecea, della rivista.
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.59 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/249131
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 182
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 179
social impact