We use a within-subjects design to study how responsibility for the payofs of diferent number of others infuences the choices under risk, and how choosing together with another person changes these decisions. After controlling for the regression to the mean, we fnd a weak efect of responsibility for one other person on risk taking as compared to choosing just for oneself. We, however, do fnd that the number of others infuenced by the choice matters: when it increases from one to three, risk averse subjects choose riskier options and risk loving subjects choose more cautiously, which pushes the choices towards the modal risk preferences in the population. Mutual responsibility makes choices for others shift even more in the same direction. The observed behavior is in accordance with the blame avoidance hypothesis: decision makers with responsibility try to reduce the amount of blame for their choices, which is minimal when the choices for others are consistent with what they would have chosen for themselves.

The Impact of the Level of Responsibility on Choices under Risk: the Role of Blame / Eijkelenboom, Gilbert; Rohde, Ingrid; Vostroknutov, Alexander. - In: EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1386-4157. - 22 (2019):(2019), pp. 794-814. [10.1007/s10683-018-9587-y]

The Impact of the Level of Responsibility on Choices under Risk: the Role of Blame

Vostroknutov, Alexander
2019-01-01

Abstract

We use a within-subjects design to study how responsibility for the payofs of diferent number of others infuences the choices under risk, and how choosing together with another person changes these decisions. After controlling for the regression to the mean, we fnd a weak efect of responsibility for one other person on risk taking as compared to choosing just for oneself. We, however, do fnd that the number of others infuenced by the choice matters: when it increases from one to three, risk averse subjects choose riskier options and risk loving subjects choose more cautiously, which pushes the choices towards the modal risk preferences in the population. Mutual responsibility makes choices for others shift even more in the same direction. The observed behavior is in accordance with the blame avoidance hypothesis: decision makers with responsibility try to reduce the amount of blame for their choices, which is minimal when the choices for others are consistent with what they would have chosen for themselves.
2019
Eijkelenboom, Gilbert; Rohde, Ingrid; Vostroknutov, Alexander
The Impact of the Level of Responsibility on Choices under Risk: the Role of Blame / Eijkelenboom, Gilbert; Rohde, Ingrid; Vostroknutov, Alexander. - In: EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1386-4157. - 22 (2019):(2019), pp. 794-814. [10.1007/s10683-018-9587-y]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prefsresp_EV_EXEX_RR4.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 522.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
522.93 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
s10683-018-9587-y.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.65 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/220715
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact