One of the largest surveys in Europe about energy consumption in Italian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is presented, based on 241 WWTPs and a total population equivalent (PE) of more than 9,000,000 PE. The study contributes towards standardised resilient data and benchmarking and to identify potentials for energy savings. In the energy benchmark, three indicators were used: specific energy consumption expressed per population equivalents (kWh PE-1 year-1), per cubic meter (kWh/m3), and per unit of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removed (kWh/kgCOD). The indicator kWh/m3, even though widely applied, resulted in a biased benchmark, because highly influenced by stormwater and infiltrations. Plants with combined networks (often used in Europe) showed an apparent better energy performance. Conversely, the indicator kWh PE-1 year-1 resulted in a more meaningful definition of a benchmark. High energy efficiency was associated with: (i) large capacity of the plant, (ii) higher COD concentration in wastewater, (iii) separate sewer systems, (iv) capacity utilisation over 80%, and (v) high organic loads, but without overloading. The 25th percentile was proposed as a benchmark for four size classes: 23 kWh PE-1 y-1 for large plants > 100,000 PE; 42 kWh PE-1 y-1 for capacity 10,000 < PE < 100,000, 48 kWh PE-1 y-1 for capacity 2,000 > PE > 10,000 and 76 kWh PE-1 y-1 for small plants < 2,000 PE.

Benchmarking of energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants – A survey of over 200 plants in Italy / Vaccari, M.; Foladori, P.; Nembrini, S.; Vitali, F.. - In: WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0273-1223. - STAMPA. - 2018:77(9)(2018), pp. 2242-2252. [10.2166/wst.2018.035]

Benchmarking of energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants – A survey of over 200 plants in Italy.

Foladori P.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

One of the largest surveys in Europe about energy consumption in Italian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is presented, based on 241 WWTPs and a total population equivalent (PE) of more than 9,000,000 PE. The study contributes towards standardised resilient data and benchmarking and to identify potentials for energy savings. In the energy benchmark, three indicators were used: specific energy consumption expressed per population equivalents (kWh PE-1 year-1), per cubic meter (kWh/m3), and per unit of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removed (kWh/kgCOD). The indicator kWh/m3, even though widely applied, resulted in a biased benchmark, because highly influenced by stormwater and infiltrations. Plants with combined networks (often used in Europe) showed an apparent better energy performance. Conversely, the indicator kWh PE-1 year-1 resulted in a more meaningful definition of a benchmark. High energy efficiency was associated with: (i) large capacity of the plant, (ii) higher COD concentration in wastewater, (iii) separate sewer systems, (iv) capacity utilisation over 80%, and (v) high organic loads, but without overloading. The 25th percentile was proposed as a benchmark for four size classes: 23 kWh PE-1 y-1 for large plants > 100,000 PE; 42 kWh PE-1 y-1 for capacity 10,000 < PE < 100,000, 48 kWh PE-1 y-1 for capacity 2,000 > PE > 10,000 and 76 kWh PE-1 y-1 for small plants < 2,000 PE.
2018
77(9)
Vaccari, M.; Foladori, P.; Nembrini, S.; Vitali, F.
Benchmarking of energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants – A survey of over 200 plants in Italy / Vaccari, M.; Foladori, P.; Nembrini, S.; Vitali, F.. - In: WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0273-1223. - STAMPA. - 2018:77(9)(2018), pp. 2242-2252. [10.2166/wst.2018.035]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vaccari et al_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 624.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
624.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/202148
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact