This contribution aims to clarify some fundamental issues concerning contact linguistics, by (a) defining language contact, (b) distinguishing between investigation levels and (c) presenting the methodology of this particular explanatory approach to the analysis of contact linguistics phenomena. The perspective, from which I address the questions above, is largely atypical within the field of contact linguistics. It starts from the well-known distinction between E- and I-language introduced by CHOMSKY (1986) and draws up a linguistic model of the internal principles and rules (I-Grammar) that govern the combination and recombination of abstract linguistic features from different languages in both the mind of the bilingual person and the grammatical system of a bilingual community. I present data from Cimbrian, a German-based minority language still spoken in Northern Italy, which is a key-study for contact linguistics, since it has been evolving under pressure from Italian and Romance dialects for many centuries. The contact phenomena are analyzed both from the perspective of the whole grammatical system, which is shared by the entire’ population of speakers, and from the perspective of the grammatical innovations so far made by very few speakers, which may, nevertheless, represent possible future developments of the Cimbrian grammar.

Reassessing contact linguistics: signposts towards an explanatory approach to language contact / Bidese, Ermenegildo. - In: ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR DIALEKTOLOGIE UND LINGUISTIK. - ISSN 0044-1449. - STAMPA. - 2017, 84:2-3(2017), pp. 126-151.

Reassessing contact linguistics: signposts towards an explanatory approach to language contact

Bidese, Ermenegildo
2017-01-01

Abstract

This contribution aims to clarify some fundamental issues concerning contact linguistics, by (a) defining language contact, (b) distinguishing between investigation levels and (c) presenting the methodology of this particular explanatory approach to the analysis of contact linguistics phenomena. The perspective, from which I address the questions above, is largely atypical within the field of contact linguistics. It starts from the well-known distinction between E- and I-language introduced by CHOMSKY (1986) and draws up a linguistic model of the internal principles and rules (I-Grammar) that govern the combination and recombination of abstract linguistic features from different languages in both the mind of the bilingual person and the grammatical system of a bilingual community. I present data from Cimbrian, a German-based minority language still spoken in Northern Italy, which is a key-study for contact linguistics, since it has been evolving under pressure from Italian and Romance dialects for many centuries. The contact phenomena are analyzed both from the perspective of the whole grammatical system, which is shared by the entire’ population of speakers, and from the perspective of the grammatical innovations so far made by very few speakers, which may, nevertheless, represent possible future developments of the Cimbrian grammar.
2017
2-3
Bidese, Ermenegildo
Reassessing contact linguistics: signposts towards an explanatory approach to language contact / Bidese, Ermenegildo. - In: ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR DIALEKTOLOGIE UND LINGUISTIK. - ISSN 0044-1449. - STAMPA. - 2017, 84:2-3(2017), pp. 126-151.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bidese_Explanativ_2017_Finale.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 588.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
588.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
44851469.pdf

Open Access dal 01/07/2019

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 728.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
728.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/192885
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact